One more thing: I noticed that the "heuristic detection" of your
"maleware" was actually based on the basis of it being very new and not
used by many - which is of course bound to be the case for EVERY exe you
will produce (and whatever update the AV people produce for their virus
database)!
Only way I see to get rid of those false positives: build all your exe's
into a well-defined single folder (and its subfolders) and declare the
whole folder as an exception not to be scanned by the AV.
On 02-Jan-17 03:27, Emanuel Falkenauer wrote:
> On 01-Jan-17 19:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> From: Stephen <
[hidden email]>
>>> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 17:01:49 +0000
>>>
>>> Eli - I did indeed send a copy of the file to Norton with a suitable
>>> note. However I can see from searches that over the years this very same
>>> virus has arisen form others compiling to exe files, and these folk have
>>> raised a false positive with Norton. Nothing however seems to improve.
>>> So I was hoping to understand why this is happening to me. Thanks for
>>> getting back to me, Stephen
>> You aren't having a virus, that's for sure. If Norton aren't going to
>> fix this, simply switch to another anti-virus software.
>>
>> This happened to me (not with Norton), last time a couple of months
>> ago. I reported that, and the problem was promptly fixed with the
>> next update of the virus database.
> I had those with Avast many times and, indeed, I reported the false
> positives... But I guess it's not easy for the AV people to take into
> account such reports: after all, a virus maker could report their own
> maleware as a false positive in order not to be detected!
> Best workaround: declare your own concoctions as exceptions for the AV
> not to scan.
>
> Best for 2017 to you all!
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot>> _______________________________________________
>> MinGW-users mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
>> This list observes the Etiquette found at
>>
http://www.mingw.org/Mailing_Lists.
>> We ask that you be polite and do the same. Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
>>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users>> Also: mailto:
[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot> _______________________________________________
> MinGW-users mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
> This list observes the Etiquette found at
>
http://www.mingw.org/Mailing_Lists.
> We ask that you be polite and do the same. Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.
>
> _______________________________________________
> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users> Also: mailto:
[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
MinGW-users mailing list
[hidden email]
This list observes the Etiquette found at
http://www.mingw.org/Mailing_Lists.
We ask that you be polite and do the same. Disregard for the list etiquette may cause your account to be moderated.
_______________________________________________
You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-usersAlso: mailto:
[hidden email]?subject=unsubscribe
Locked
